Mitt Romney for President, MyManMitt.com
About Us
Contact Us
Donate to Mitt Romney Campaign

Mitt Romney on the Issues
Videos Mitt Romney
Help Mitt Romney



Founders

  • Justin Hart
  • Jason Bonham

Managing Directors

  • Tim Cross
  • Kyle Hampton

Blogger Pool

  • Scott Allan
  • Jason Bonham
  • Dave Burris
  • John Cordiero
  • Tim Cross
  • Jeff Fuller
  • Aaron Gulbransen
  • Kyle Hampton
  • Maurice Harris
  • Justin Hart
  • Julie Johnson
  • Neal Jones
  • Bill Knowling
  • Mike Laub
  • Devon Murphy
  • Ben Wren
  • Andrew Quinn

Saturday, January 12, 2008
posted by Anne | 10:16 PM | permalink
Romney over McCain. Very close, lots depends on undecideds and whether independents (or Dems) vote in the Republican primary. Detroit Free Press:

Republican primary voters whose greatest concern is the economy could give Bloomfield Hills native Mitt Romney his first major state victory in Tuesday’s Michigan presidential primary, according to the Detroit Free Press-Local 4 Michigan Poll.

Romney leads John McCain, 27%-22%, with Mike Huckabee in third at 16%, the poll showed. Romney’s core of support is in metro Detroit, where he has a 2-1 advantage.

More breakdown by issue in the story. Updated RCP average here. It's very tight.

UPDATE: RCP with more new polls. In the Michigan Mitchell poll, Romney cuts into McCain's support. yeah!

UPDATE: More good news, another poll with an EIGHT POINT Romney lead (despite the badmouthing) :

Former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney, who badly needs to win Tuesday's Michgian primary, has an eight-point lead over Sen. John McCain of Arizona in a McClatchy-MSNBC poll of Michigan voters to be released Sunday.
I'm cautiously optimistic. (And anyway, we haven't hit a really Red State yet.) More detail:
McClatchy Newspapers reported: “Romney led McCain by 2 to 1 among voters who ranked the economy and jobs their top concern. He led Huckabee by a slightly greater margin among those voters. He also led McCain by 2 to 1 among likely voters who called themselves Republicans.”

The analysis continued: “McCain owes his solid standing to independents and Democrats, taking 38 percent of their support, while Huckabee had 22 percent and Romney had 18 percent. … Evangelical Christians represented 46 percent of the likely primary vote in the poll, and Huckabee got 31 percent of their support while Romney got 23 percent.”
The Detroit News has McCain edging Mitt by one point, with 45% undecided.

These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • del.icio.us:Romney Tops Detroit Free Press Poll
  • DiggRomney Tops Detroit Free Press Poll
  • Fark:Romney Tops Detroit Free Press Poll
  • Furl:Romney Tops Detroit Free Press Poll
  • Ma.gnolia:Romney Tops Detroit Free Press Poll
  • Netscape:Romney Tops Detroit Free Press Poll
  • NewsVine:Romney Tops Detroit Free Press Poll
  • Reddit:Romney Tops Detroit Free Press Poll
  • Slashdot:Romney Tops Detroit Free Press Poll
  • StumbleUpon:Romney Tops Detroit Free Press Poll
  • TailRank:Romney Tops Detroit Free Press Poll
  • Technorati:Romney Tops Detroit Free Press Poll
  • YahooMyWeb:Romney Tops Detroit Free Press Poll

Technorati Tags: |
 
0 Comments:



posted by Anne | 9:08 PM | permalink
Hillary can forget about opposition research back to Mitt's childhood--his first grade teacher is a fan. Breitbart:
The Republican presidential contender ran into his first-grade teacher—78-year-old Gloria Blazo of Novi—as he was shaking hands Saturday following a speech to the conservative Americans For Prosperity summit here.

"He was one person you never had to reprimand about talking at all," Blazo later told reporters, after Romney brought her over to his media bus. "He worked hard and he has lots of strengths."


These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • del.icio.us:Hillary Can Forget About Opposition Research
  • DiggHillary Can Forget About Opposition Research
  • Fark:Hillary Can Forget About Opposition Research
  • Furl:Hillary Can Forget About Opposition Research
  • Ma.gnolia:Hillary Can Forget About Opposition Research
  • Netscape:Hillary Can Forget About Opposition Research
  • NewsVine:Hillary Can Forget About Opposition Research
  • Reddit:Hillary Can Forget About Opposition Research
  • Slashdot:Hillary Can Forget About Opposition Research
  • StumbleUpon:Hillary Can Forget About Opposition Research
  • TailRank:Hillary Can Forget About Opposition Research
  • Technorati:Hillary Can Forget About Opposition Research
  • YahooMyWeb:Hillary Can Forget About Opposition Research

Technorati Tags: |
 
1 Comments:


This is awesome! This is great evidence to the kind of person Mitt is.




posted by Timotheus | 12:16 PM | permalink
The latest Rasmussen numbers coming out of Michigan:

Mitt Romney 26%
John McCain 25%
Mike Huckabee 17%
Fred Thompson 9%
Ron Paul 8%
Rudy Giuliani 6%



The big problem, of course, is that no one has any idea how many independents and democrats will vote in the Republican Primary. Nor, for that matter, how they will vote.

Thanks to Jeff Fuller for the link.
These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • del.icio.us:Close Race in Michigan
  • DiggClose Race in Michigan
  • Fark:Close Race in Michigan
  • Furl:Close Race in Michigan
  • Ma.gnolia:Close Race in Michigan
  • Netscape:Close Race in Michigan
  • NewsVine:Close Race in Michigan
  • Reddit:Close Race in Michigan
  • Slashdot:Close Race in Michigan
  • StumbleUpon:Close Race in Michigan
  • TailRank:Close Race in Michigan
  • Technorati:Close Race in Michigan
  • YahooMyWeb:Close Race in Michigan

Technorati Tags: |
 
6 Comments:


I think the media has been sensing that Mitt might win Michigan and that's why they have ben downplaying the win saying his father was blah, blah. The other thing is this dialy kos thing has been talked about on TV, Usually they would never say anything about the blogosphere so they are using that to pre smear a win..Even if dems and independents cross over and vote for Mitt, the exit polls will show a republican win.On the other hand Mitt could lay claim that he's the economy's white knight.Either way he'll still claim another slug of delegates and increase his lead in the popular vote.With Thompson possibly taking some votes away for McHuckabee in SC he could squeeze in a 2nd place finish there also, making Fla. a toss up.



You guys may want to check this out. About how Huck is using a Robo Push Polling outfit to attack Romney, info is here

http://www.tpmmuckraker.com/archives/005057.php

By Anonymous Anonymous, at January 12, 2008 1:49 PM  


Thanks for posting this good news. I believe Mitt will win but if not he should stay in thru Super Tuesday because it is going to be a big crapshoot with 22 states and there are any number of scenarios as to how this all plays out. Also, want to thank you guys and gal for providing this resource. Not sure if us commenters tell you that enough.



Check out this video about Huckabee and his clemency record -- it's awesome!

http://arkjournal.com/2008/01/clemency.html

By Anonymous bethtopaz, at January 12, 2008 8:20 PM  


Huck has proven himself to be a very underhanded person all along the way through the primaries.He started off using religion as a wedge issue under the advice of Dick Morris.He claims to have this nice guy personna but he never misses an oppurtunity to take a back handed swipe at somebody. His latest victim is Thompson.Despite the story about Kos encouraging dems to vote for Romney,I have a bad,bad feeling that independents are going to put Mccain over the top in Michigan.What's happened to Mitt since he got in the race is very sad. A very decent human being has been villified by hack newspapers who are in the tank for Hillary.McCain and Huck have tag teamed Mitt for their own shallow personal gains.I can't and won't vote for Huck or McCain because they have both ran a dirty campaign.We have a real chance to reform government and make it work for the people with Mitt but the MSM is dead set on promoting McHuckabee because they know they will be losers in Nov. Even if Mccain won in Nov it would be a shallow victory because he's no different than the dems.My only hope if Mitt has to drop out is Guliani becomes the nom.I strongly dislike he pro choice but I believe he will fight tooth and nail against the dangerous dem congress.



Good analysis Spidey, and if McHuck win the nomination - I will vote for Obama in November. If we're gonna have a liberal president - let the Dems take the credit for it. (And if Hill's the Dem nom, I think I will just stay home and knit on election day....)




posted by Kyle | 11:45 AM | permalink
Romney overwhelmingly wins Ottawa County, MI straw poll:
Ottawa County is generally considered one of the most Republican counties in the state.

Geraldine Vruggink, a Romney supporter from Hudsonville, said she is attracted to his practical and business experience and to his "high morals." If Romney is elected, people won't have to worry about what is going on at the White House, she said.

Labels:

These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • del.icio.us:Good things to come?
  • DiggGood things to come?
  • Fark:Good things to come?
  • Furl:Good things to come?
  • Ma.gnolia:Good things to come?
  • Netscape:Good things to come?
  • NewsVine:Good things to come?
  • Reddit:Good things to come?
  • Slashdot:Good things to come?
  • StumbleUpon:Good things to come?
  • TailRank:Good things to come?
  • Technorati:Good things to come?
  • YahooMyWeb:Good things to come?

Technorati Tags: |
 
1 Comments:


Like elected officials accepting bribes. (Huckster)

By Anonymous Joe Mama, at January 12, 2008 12:18 PM  



posted by Jeff Fuller | 1:04 AM | permalink
The CNN New Hampshire exit polling confirms that those with the liberal mindset were the ones responsible for vaulting John McCain to win there and thereby granting him somewhat of a "front-runner" status.

Numbers don't lie (and remember, these are just the numbers from the voters in the GOP NH primary):

52% think that Abortion should be "legal"

53% go to church "never" or "a few times a year"

49% have a negative opinion of Bush

57% do not "strongly oppose" civil unions

50% support a "path to citizenship" or a "guest worker program" for illegals already here.

39% of them are not Republicans

Only 21% say they're "very conservative" (BTW, Romney beat McCain 43% to 18% among them).

45% admit to being moderates or liberals.

Finally, 50% made their decision within the last week (with a full 19% admitting to deciding on the day of the primary).

So they're not just liberals . . . they're fickle liberals.

Thanks for nothing New Hampshire.

Jeff Fuller
These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • del.icio.us:Liberal Types Give New Hampshire Win to McCain
  • DiggLiberal Types Give New Hampshire Win to McCain
  • Fark:Liberal Types Give New Hampshire Win to McCain
  • Furl:Liberal Types Give New Hampshire Win to McCain
  • Ma.gnolia:Liberal Types Give New Hampshire Win to McCain
  • Netscape:Liberal Types Give New Hampshire Win to McCain
  • NewsVine:Liberal Types Give New Hampshire Win to McCain
  • Reddit:Liberal Types Give New Hampshire Win to McCain
  • Slashdot:Liberal Types Give New Hampshire Win to McCain
  • StumbleUpon:Liberal Types Give New Hampshire Win to McCain
  • TailRank:Liberal Types Give New Hampshire Win to McCain
  • Technorati:Liberal Types Give New Hampshire Win to McCain
  • YahooMyWeb:Liberal Types Give New Hampshire Win to McCain

Technorati Tags: |
 
2 Comments:


I'm going to wind up needing a neck brace from shaking my head at McCain and Huck still leading in the national and SC poll.Neither one has any clue about what to do about the economy or really tackling the out of control Federal budget. Even if McCain stopped earmarks they make up a small % of the entire budget.We need a 20% reduction in the federal workforce to balance the budget. This can be done by streamling the governmnet by direct money to states without mandates. The mandates attached to Federal bills requires thousands of Federal monitors to check compliane. Not only is it a waste of human resources it's a huge waste of paper.

It's amazing how Mitt continues to pile up endorsements and it doesn't seem to matter. Illegal immigration is bankrupting the country and McCain supports amnesty.Security is another top issues and Huck has no clue on it but because he's likeable and pro life he's up in the polls.

It's absolutely absurd that we're going to pick the next president based on personality and not qualifications.



All Romney supporters, let's make a push for donations on Wednesday, January 16, 2008, the day after the Michigan primaries. The media and the other Republican candidates are trying to push MITT out because they know he is strong.

I will be a first time donor. If you haven't donated, donate on that day. If you already donated, do it again on that day, even if it's just $10.

Now the hard part, commit to finding five more people who will donate on that day. We have to get up off our duffs and do something or a good man may go down, and we will wonder why. Also, try to get your five donors to commit to finding five more donors.

I may only get a little tree here in New Mexico, but if everybody else gets a small tree, we may just create a forest.

COMMIT TO MITT.

DONATE ON JANUARY 16, 2008.




posted by Anne | 12:34 AM | permalink

Head of Christian Home-School Entity Endorses Romney — Says Huckabee Imposed Restrictions on Home-Schoolers in Arkansas[snip]


Smith writes that Huckabee “says he supports home-schoolers and that they should be left alone, yet he signed into law a bill that imposed new restrictions on homeschoolers in AR.”
These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • del.icio.us:Home Schoolers for Romney
  • DiggHome Schoolers for Romney
  • Fark:Home Schoolers for Romney
  • Furl:Home Schoolers for Romney
  • Ma.gnolia:Home Schoolers for Romney
  • Netscape:Home Schoolers for Romney
  • NewsVine:Home Schoolers for Romney
  • Reddit:Home Schoolers for Romney
  • Slashdot:Home Schoolers for Romney
  • StumbleUpon:Home Schoolers for Romney
  • TailRank:Home Schoolers for Romney
  • Technorati:Home Schoolers for Romney
  • YahooMyWeb:Home Schoolers for Romney

Technorati Tags: |
 
2 Comments:


As someone who was home schooled, AMEN! Finally, someone made an informed decision about Huckabee!

By Anonymous Anonymous, at January 12, 2008 12:24 PM  


You could write a War and Peace sized novel on Huck's hypocricy and contradictions and flat out lies.. Whenever he gets cornered on one of them he resorts to an old tired one liner as a distraction. Now he's claiming Fred Thompson needs Metamucil because he busted his chops in the debate the other night.

He has been claiming that he only gave one speech to the embryonic stem cell company and it turned out to be 3,pocketing hefty fees in the process.

He claimed when he gave the Jesus/Satan brother thing to the Times magazine that he didn't know that much about Mormonism. However he attended a southern Baptist convention in 1998 in Utah where the main topic was the difference between the two religions was the main course. The lazy and cheerleading MSM does nothing to point all these things out about him.




Friday, January 11, 2008
posted by Timotheus | 5:10 PM | permalink


Good to see the newspaper endorsements used so quickly.
These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • del.icio.us:Romney Ad: Pride of America
  • DiggRomney Ad: Pride of America
  • Fark:Romney Ad: Pride of America
  • Furl:Romney Ad: Pride of America
  • Ma.gnolia:Romney Ad: Pride of America
  • Netscape:Romney Ad: Pride of America
  • NewsVine:Romney Ad: Pride of America
  • Reddit:Romney Ad: Pride of America
  • Slashdot:Romney Ad: Pride of America
  • StumbleUpon:Romney Ad: Pride of America
  • TailRank:Romney Ad: Pride of America
  • Technorati:Romney Ad: Pride of America
  • YahooMyWeb:Romney Ad: Pride of America

Technorati Tags: |
 
0 Comments:



posted by Anne | 10:55 AM | permalink
Following up on Kyle's previous post. The RCP Blog, in their first roundup of stories of the day, reports that Mitt got a good headline out of last night's debate in the Detroit Free Press, "Romney Pledges to Fight for Michigan Jobs During Debate". Looks like the unpopularity of Dem governor Jennifer Granholm may help Republicans who have a strong economic message and track record--Mitt is the best on that.

UPDATE: More debate reaction. Gateway Pundit. Likes Romney, makes good points on McCain and Huck (that support Mitt). Hugh Hewitt.
These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • del.icio.us:Good Headline in Michigan for Mitt
  • DiggGood Headline in Michigan for Mitt
  • Fark:Good Headline in Michigan for Mitt
  • Furl:Good Headline in Michigan for Mitt
  • Ma.gnolia:Good Headline in Michigan for Mitt
  • Netscape:Good Headline in Michigan for Mitt
  • NewsVine:Good Headline in Michigan for Mitt
  • Reddit:Good Headline in Michigan for Mitt
  • Slashdot:Good Headline in Michigan for Mitt
  • StumbleUpon:Good Headline in Michigan for Mitt
  • TailRank:Good Headline in Michigan for Mitt
  • Technorati:Good Headline in Michigan for Mitt
  • YahooMyWeb:Good Headline in Michigan for Mitt

Technorati Tags: |
 
4 Comments:


Yes! It's great to see Mitt finally getting the positive attention he deserves from the MSM!



I think team romney should start a gold prospectors theme, hit Nevada asking voters to join the search for gold for team mitt.



I think Romney made this point somewhere, but electing Granholm should be viewed as a profound failure for liberal Democrat policies. I am unaware of what increased “safety net” has been provided by her administration, but it seems clear to me that no “safety net” can make up for the absence of jobs that Michigan now faces. I would suspect that such things are clear to most Michigan residents as well.

I want to re-mention my concern associated with Michigan and the Democrat / Independent vote. It seems that two separate liberals have called for Democrats to vote in the Republican primary for the purpose of wounding the Republicans. I would hope that whatever effects this has upon the race (even if it benefits Romney) will be highlighted so the voice of conservatives can be heard on the road to the Republican nomination. This may be incredibly difficult because I would guess that Romney can attract some registered Democrats because of the above failure of the liberal policies of the Granholm administration. It would be desirable to define who voted for Romney (and other candidates) because of conservative principles that could really help Michigan, and who voted for Romney (and others) because they hope to support Hillary or Obama in the general election.

Thanks, TOm



Seeing a positive story in the MSM about Mitt is as rare as seeing one about Bush.God I'm praying Mitt can win in Mich.Seeing McCain emerge in the national polls is enough to make me hide all the sharp objects.When are the conservatives going to start voting for crying out loud.




posted by Kyle | 10:22 AM | permalink
John Nevin penned an op/ed for the Detroit Free Press yesterday. In that op/ed he argued that Mitt Romney is the best candidate for the Michigan and the Great Lakes:
Mitt Romney grew up in that tradition and has a firsthand appreciation of how important the Great Lakes are to Michigan's high quality of life. Romney knows that Michigan's ecology and economy depend on healthy Great Lakes and clean water that is safe for drinking, beaches that are safe for swimming, and fish that are safe for eating.


We go ahold of Mr. Nevin and asked him a few follow-up questions.

MMM: What part of Michigan are you from?

JN: I am from Holt, a suburb of Lansing, right near Michigan State University.

MMM: What is your occupation?

JN: I am a policy adviser to a binational group that provides advice to governments regarding water quality and water quantity issues. Previously, I wrote speeches and provided communications advice to Governor John Engler for 12 years.

MMM: How would you describe your political leanings?

JN: My political leanings are definitely conservative but with a pragmatic, common sense approach that emphasizes results more than ideology. I am strongly pro-life and wouldn’t support a candidate who wasn’t.

MMM: Why endorse Mitt Romney?

JN: I’ve endorsed Mitt Romney for many reasons. He’s an experienced executive with a track record of success who understands how to manage change and to transform complex organizations. Second, just looking at his family, you know right away that he is an incredibly strong and compassionate leader. He doesn’t need the presidency. The presidency needs him.

MMM: You say in your Op/Ed that Mitt Romney will be best for Michigan and the Great Lakes. Why?

JN: Mitt would be best for the Great Lakes because I know he wouldn’t tolerate the lack of responsibility and accountability for current programs. He’s the only candidate who would have the ability to slash the bureaucracy, reorganize and focus on the key threats to the lakes. The bottom line is that Mitt is all about results and that’s the kind of leadership we need. And of course, it helps that he is from Michigan and has a true understanding and appreciation for how important the lakes are to our state, our economy and our culture.

Labels:

These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • del.icio.us:MMM Interview: John Nevin
  • DiggMMM Interview: John Nevin
  • Fark:MMM Interview: John Nevin
  • Furl:MMM Interview: John Nevin
  • Ma.gnolia:MMM Interview: John Nevin
  • Netscape:MMM Interview: John Nevin
  • NewsVine:MMM Interview: John Nevin
  • Reddit:MMM Interview: John Nevin
  • Slashdot:MMM Interview: John Nevin
  • StumbleUpon:MMM Interview: John Nevin
  • TailRank:MMM Interview: John Nevin
  • Technorati:MMM Interview: John Nevin
  • YahooMyWeb:MMM Interview: John Nevin

Technorati Tags: |
 
2 Comments:


Awesome slogan, "Mitt Romney doesn't need the presidency, the presidency needs him!"

By Anonymous Anonymous, at January 11, 2008 10:49 AM  


I thought the exact same thing. That would be great on a Romney ad.




posted by Justin Hart | 7:35 AM | permalink
NBC's Chuck Todd: "Mitt Romney's last answer about what he's been hearing on the campaign trail was one of his best messages I've heard yet." - link

Townhall's Mary Katharine Ham: "Mitt had a good line about Paul reading Ahmadinejad press releases." - link

National Review's Kathryn Jean Lopez: "Taking Washington apart. This is a strong outsider argument - that rings true. Romney would do it because he has." - link

ABC's Rick Klein: "Ahh, the R-word. 'Could we be headed for a recession? Absolutely. Do we have to be headed for a recession? Absolutely not.' Good answer by Mitt Romney." - link

National Review's Rich Lowry: "Mitt's change answer. Good. The best part of his stump speech." - link

Townhall's Hugh Hewitt: "Romney had less screen time tonight, but each time he answered he was poised and eloquent." - link

O'Beirne: "Mitt Romney's optimism recalls Reagan."

The American Spectator's Quin Hillyer: "Now Romney gets a tough question on abortion. He starts out with a really really strong answer. Now he segues back to Reagan. He ably defends 'the principles that Ronald Reagan espoused.' Good answer."

Labels:

These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • del.icio.us:Reaction to Romney at the Debate
  • DiggReaction to Romney at the Debate
  • Fark:Reaction to Romney at the Debate
  • Furl:Reaction to Romney at the Debate
  • Ma.gnolia:Reaction to Romney at the Debate
  • Netscape:Reaction to Romney at the Debate
  • NewsVine:Reaction to Romney at the Debate
  • Reddit:Reaction to Romney at the Debate
  • Slashdot:Reaction to Romney at the Debate
  • StumbleUpon:Reaction to Romney at the Debate
  • TailRank:Reaction to Romney at the Debate
  • Technorati:Reaction to Romney at the Debate
  • YahooMyWeb:Reaction to Romney at the Debate

Technorati Tags: |
 
3 Comments:


Romney did well at the debate. Take a look at this morning's headline stories in Michigan:

"Press editorial board endorses Romney" www.mlive.com

"Romney attacks McCain's Mich. 'pessimism'" http://www.detnews.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080111/POLITICS01/801110406

By Anonymous Anonymous, at January 11, 2008 9:08 AM  


Yeah, Mitt did well - when he got a question!!! It seemed like a lot of attention was spent on McCain who is a one-horse show and can only talk "war." The only thing I didn't like was when Mitt made that jab at Ron Paul. I felt bad for Ron Paul, and it made me wince when Mitt said that; I've not seen him take a shot like that before....



Great job again last night in the debate for Romney. Regarding Huckabee, I cringed when he dove into his claim again that he instigated the first broad-based tax cut in 160 years in Arkansas. Just this week, Ernest Dumas wrote an article in the Arkansas Times exposing the truth about that broad-based tax cuts. They were devised by Gov. Jim Guy Tucker. Tucker resigned after a Whitewater conviction and the Huckster moved into the Governor's mansion. He also then immediately took credit for the tax cuts. Please, someone in the national media expose this guy!

By Anonymous Arkansas Voter, at January 11, 2008 12:05 PM  



Thursday, January 10, 2008
posted by Kyle | 8:06 PM | permalink
... about the Fox News debate tonight (at 9:00 PM Eastern). Get all your friends to watch Romney win the debate. It will be on TV and online.

Go Romney!

Labels:

These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • del.icio.us:Don't forget...
  • DiggDon't forget...
  • Fark:Don't forget...
  • Furl:Don't forget...
  • Ma.gnolia:Don't forget...
  • Netscape:Don't forget...
  • NewsVine:Don't forget...
  • Reddit:Don't forget...
  • Slashdot:Don't forget...
  • StumbleUpon:Don't forget...
  • TailRank:Don't forget...
  • Technorati:Don't forget...
  • YahooMyWeb:Don't forget...

Technorati Tags: |
 
1 Comments:


Fred stole the show at the debate tonight, though he was channeling Mitt Romney with a lot of his answers. I thought "where have I heard that before...oh yeah, Mitt!" Mitt didn't get many questions and sort of faded into the background, but he did great answering on foreign policy (showing he knows more than he gets credit for) and talking about the Reagan coalition.




posted by jason | 6:59 PM | permalink
Hey Folks,

I am headed for Michigan tomorrow night after work. On Saturday I will be attending the Americans for Prosperity meeting in Livonia Michigan, where I will be live blogging it. This will feature Governor Romney, Sen. McCain, Rep. Duncan Hunter, several MI officials, reporters from various news outfits such as the Wall Street Journal and more.

Along with this, interviews set up with Duncan Hunter and Michigan GOP Chair, Saul Anuzis. On Monday and tuesday I should be embedded with the Romney campaign as well.

If you are interested in donating to my efforts (it isn't free for me!) you can donate here and send money to jasonpbonham@hotmail.com. I appreciate all those who help last time, I was able to cover almost the whole trip.

Thanks!
These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • del.icio.us:Headed for Michigan
  • DiggHeaded for Michigan
  • Fark:Headed for Michigan
  • Furl:Headed for Michigan
  • Ma.gnolia:Headed for Michigan
  • Netscape:Headed for Michigan
  • NewsVine:Headed for Michigan
  • Reddit:Headed for Michigan
  • Slashdot:Headed for Michigan